In With the Old

Wall Street Journal

By JOHN A. PEARCE I I

OCTOBER 20, 2008

Reconstructed products offer a promising market for many companies. But turning used products into new ones isn’t a sure

thing.

What Does It Involve?

Companies looking for new profit opportunities should remember one simple

idea: Everything old can be new again.

More than 130,000 companies across the U.S. have gotten into the business of

reconstruction — taking used products and processing them for resale. These

products bring in annual sales of more than $300 billion, in categories as varied

as plastic bottles, machine tools, medical equipment and furniture, and for many

companies they represent a booming business. At Caterpillar Inc., for instance,

the remanufacturing operation is one of the fastest-growing divisions in the

company.

The profit margins are also compelling. Reconstructed products typically cost

40% to 65% less to make than new ones, meaning much higher margins — an

average of 20% compared with less than 10% for new products. That is true even

though reconstructed products often sell for less than new ones. Another plus:

Reconstruction lets companies profit multiple times from an initial investment

by leveraging existing facilities and expertise.

Despite the impressive performance, there are still many opportunities for

growth in reconstruction. U.S. spending on reconstructed products represents

less than 2% of gross domestic product, compared with 10% for new

manufactured products.

What follows is an overview for companies looking to get into the reconstruction

business, drawn from reviewing dozens of corporate initiatives and resulting best

practices. I will outline the different types of reconstruction, as well as the types

of customers that companies might pursue. I will also examine some caveats

companies need to consider.

Reconstruction comes in three forms: recycling, refurbishing and remanufacturing.

Who Buys the Products?

In recycling, a used product is broken down into its constituent parts and then

used to make a new product, possibly different from the original. Products that

are frequently recycled include paper, steel, glass, aluminum, plastic and rubber.

With refurbishing, companies take a product and restore it, aesthetically or

mechanically, to its original condition. Typically, this involves a thorough

cleaning, followed by the replacement or reconditioning of component parts.

Products that are commonly refurbished include medical equipment, office

furniture, antiques, electronics and diesel locomotives. Single-use cameras are a

particularly good example of the practice: Not only are they cheap to spruce up,

they can be rebuilt as many as 10 times after customers drop them off.

Remanufacturing is very much like refurbishing, with one important difference.

When the product is rebuilt, it is not just restored to its original condition, it is

upgraded with new features or qualities.

For a closer look at the differences between these three processes, consider office

workstations. In recycling, a company might strip fabric from the workstation’s

divider panels and convert it to industrial padding. Refurbishing might involve

removing the original fabric and replacing it with new material to make the

workstation look as good as new. In remanufacturing, the fabric might be

replaced with material that not only looks better but is also flame retardant and

stain resistant.

The customers for reconstructed products fall into six basic types.

Customers who do not want to buy new equipment because it would not fit into

their processes. Consider a company that has a complex production line. It might

be tough to find new machines that can fit into the existing system precisely;

refurbishing or remanufacturing existing machines is often a much simpler

course.

Customers who want to avoid red tape. Take municipal transit authorities, which

face strict requirements for the motors that power their cars. Getting approval for

new designs can be lengthy, complicated and costly. Again, it is easier to go with

refurbished or remanufactured gear than to pursue all-new equipment.

Customers who do not have the capital to invest in new equipment, or will not

use the equipment enough to make the cost worthwhile. In many — but not all –

cases, reconstructed goods are cheaper than new ones, which makes them

appealing to buyers with limited needs or means. So, farmers with limited

acreage, for instance, often prefer remanufactured tractors. Likewise, fire

departments in small communities often choose remanufactured fire engines,

and corporations whose executives make local flights go for remanufactured

airplanes.

What Are the Risks?

Customers who want to extend the useful life of a product that has been

discontinued by the original manufacturer. For instance, a customer who is

rebuilding an antique car needs parts that are no longer made to the exact

specifications needed. However, the customer will often find that the parts are

available in “as new” condition as reconstructed products.

Customers who want to extend the useful life of a current product. This,

obviously, is one of the broadest categories of customers. People buy a wide

range of reconstructed goods that help keep products in good condition at a low

cost, including replacement automobile upholstery, kitchen-cabinet refacing,

marine compressors, heavy-duty truck transmissions and porcelain-bathtub

refinishing.

Customers who are interested in environmentally friendly products. “Buying

green” is increasingly popular among corporate purchasing departments, as well

as individual consumers. Remanufactured goods are often a perfect fit for these

customers, since reconstruction reduces the need to buy and use high levels of

energy and virgin materials in creating products.

Customers are showing that they are prepared to shell out higher prices for

environmentally sensitive remanufactured goods. Buyers of remanufactured

lumber, furniture, flooring and millwork, for instance, are willing to pay an 18%

premium over the prices of equivalent new products, and are willing to travel an

additional 35 minutes to purchase these products.

It is not just consumer interest that is driving the growth of this market. State

governments across the U.S. are implementing laws and guidelines that benefit

companies engaged in product reconstruction. For instance, nearly 30 states

have introduced legislation that calls for recycling electronic waste to keep it out

of landfills.

The biggest caveat about reconstruction is that some forms require lots of knowhow.

Indeed, the job is often best suited to companies that already make the

products in question. It is very tough for companies to simply plunge into

reconstructing products without being intimately familiar with the

manufacturing processes that initially created them. Not only that, if a company

is new to an industry, it can take lots of sales work to build up a market for

reconstructed wares.

Each variety of reconstruction has special challenges. At first glance, recycling

seems inviting. Entry barriers can be low; raw materials, for instance, are often

cheap. However, the job of collecting those materials and transporting them to a

recycling facility can vary greatly in complexity, time requirements, predictability

and expense. Companies must have the capability to do the pickup and transport

economically — and they must also have the resources, facilities and personnel

for processing the materials.

For example, an estimated 300 billion tires lie discarded in the U.S., with more

than 270 million added to the total each year. However, the cost of transporting

the raw material is high, as are the costs for plant and equipment and, in the

cases of sophisticated recycling, maintaining an educated and skilled work force.

What is more, if many companies plunge into a recycling niche, all those entrants

end up competing for market share and resources, while driving up the supply of

finished goods and driving down prices and profit margins.

Refurbishing adds another layer of complexity. Because companies are restoring

goods to new condition, they must be familiar with the design and features of the

original product and must possess the capability to disassemble and reassemble

that product. Specialized labeling and packaging may also be necessary.

Remanufacturing is even more complicated, since companies are not only

restoring products to new condition but upgrading them. Companies must have

experts on hand to re-engineer the given products, and a sound logistics system

to acquire and retrieve products and then guide them through the production

process — disassembling, sorting, reassembling, inspecting and testing.

For an example of what is involved, once again consider Caterpillar, which

remanufactures various diesel engines taken from used earth-moving equipment

and medium- and heavy-duty truck engines. The process includes the stripping,

dismantling, detailed cleaning and complete reconditioning of all 20,000 engine

components.

All engines are remanufactured using Caterpillar parts and produced to meet

new engine standards using the latest technology, even if it was not available

when the engine was originally manufactured.

—Dr. Pearce is the VSB endowed chair in strategic management and entrepreneurship at the Villanova

School of Business at Villanova University. He can be reached at reports@wsj.com.

Comments are closed.